Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888944›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A prospective model of the potential clinical and economic impact of cervical cancer screening supported by a mobile phone app.

Fredrick Chite Asirwa, Brian W Bresnahan, Faith Yego, Dana Duncan, James K Karichu, Louis P Garrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fredrick Chite AsirwaInternational Cancer Institute, Eldoret, Kenya.
Brian W BresnahanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Faith YegoDepartment of Health Policy, Management, and Human Nutrition, Moi University School of Public Health, Eldoret, Kenya.
Dana DuncanRoche Information Solutions, Roche Diagnostics, Santa Clara, California, United States of America.
James K KarichuGlobal Access & Policy, Roche Diagnostics Solutions, Inc., Pleasanton, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2052-4659
Louis P GarrisonThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9468-4989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer is a preventable and highly curable disease when detected early and adequately treated, yet it remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in women in Kenya due to low screening coverage and treatment. Implementing World Health Organization screening guidelines for human papillomavirus (HPV) is challenging due to the complex logistics of result return and follow-up requiring multiple clinic visits. Increasing the use of mobile technology can support follow-up care in cervical cancer screening programs.

methodsWe developed a prospective clinico-economic model to assess the potential impact of a mobile phone-based application ("app") communicating laboratory results and recommendations to improve follow-up care for cervical cancer screening in Kenya. The model is structured to simulate a three-visit pathway for HPV-based screening used in a clinical trial of the app and based on epidemiological data, clinical guideline-based workflow, and patient-based behavioral pathways. Published literature, expert elicitation, and time-and-motion observations were used to estimate clinical data, care pathways, and visit-related costs. This analysis was conducted from a base-case healthcare system perspective with a scenario from a "limited" societal perspective.

resultsIn a simulated cohort of women using the app-based intervention compared to conventional care, with 10,000 women in each arm, use of the app is projected to increase healthcare costs by $12.53 per enrolled woman during the trial period and to detect and treat an additional 247 women-229 with precancerous cervical lesions and 18 with cervical cancer. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the app versus conventional care was $174 per case detected and treated. This would be cost-saving given the average lifetime cost per cervical cancer case of $1,000-$3,000.

conclusionUse of a mobile phone-based app is costlier than conventional screening but by improving visit compliance, it can be a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy to enhance detection and treatment in cervical cancer screening programs.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMobile ApplicationsModels, EconomicUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCell PhoneCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansKenyaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39888944
PMCPMC11785268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.