ArticlePLoS genetics2025
An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combinatorial action of regulatory systems generates colistin heteroresistance.Science advances · 2026Article
- Compensatory evolution facilitates loss of prfB autoregulation in Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Historical contingency limits adaptive diversification in a spatially structured environment.Evolution letters · 2026Article
- Jumbo phage-mediated transduction of genomic islands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Extending evolutionary forecasts across bacterial species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutation rate varies within and between genomes. Within genomes, tracts of nucleotides, including short sequence repeats and palindromes, can cause localised elevation of mutation rate. Additional mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we report an instance of extreme mutational bias in Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 associated with a single base-pair change in nlpD. These mutants frequently evolve in static microcosms, and have a cell-chaining (CC) phenotype. Analysis of 153 replicate populations revealed 137 independent instances of a C565T loss-of-function mutation at codon 189 (CAG to TAG (Q189*)). Fitness measures of alternative nlpD mutants did not explain the deterministic evolution of C565T mutants. Recognising that transcription can be mutagenic, and that codon 189 overlaps with a predicted promoter (rpoSp) for the adjacent stationary phase sigma factor, rpoS, transcription across this promoter region was measured. This confirmed rpoSp is induced in stationary phase and that C565T mutation caused significant elevation of transcription. The latter provided opportunity to determine the C565T mutation rate using a reporter-gene fused to rpoSp. Fluctuation assays estimate the C565T mutation rate to be ~5,000-fold higher than expected. In Pseudomonas, transcription of rpoS requires the positive activator PsrA, which we show also holds for SBW25. Fluctuation assays performed in a ∆psrA background showed a ~60-fold reduction in mutation rate confirming that the elevated rate of mutation at C565T mutation rate is dependent on induction of transcription. This hotspot suggests a generalisable phenomenon where the induction of transcription causes elevated mutation rates within defining regions of promoters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.