ArticlePloS one2025
Automated recognition and segmentation of lung cancer cytological images based on deep learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Literature Review of You Only Look Once Architectures (v1-v12) in Healthcare Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hybrid feature fusion in cervical cancer cytology: a novel dual-module approach framework for lesion detection and classification using radiomics, deep learning, and reproducibility.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with histological examination of lung cancer, cytology is less invasive and provides better preservation of complete morphology and detail. However, traditional cytological diagnosis requires an experienced pathologist to evaluate all sections individually under a microscope, which is a time-consuming process with low interobserver consistency. With the development of deep neural networks, the You Only Look Once (YOLO) object-detection model has been recognized for its impressive speed and accuracy. Thus, in this study, we developed a model for intraoperative cytological segmentation of pulmonary lesions based on the YOLOv8 algorithm, which labels each instance by segmenting the image at the pixel level. The model achieved a mean pixel accuracy and mean intersection over union of 0.80 and 0.70, respectively, on the test set. At the image level, the accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for malignant and benign (or normal) lesions were 91.0% and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the model was deemed suitable for diagnosing pleural fluid cytology and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology images. The model predictions were strongly correlated with pathologist diagnoses and the gold standard, indicating the model's ability to make clinical-level decisions during initial diagnosis. Thus, the proposed method is useful for rapidly localizing lung cancer cells based on microscopic images and outputting image interpretation results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.