Trial reportRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Performance of flipped classroom teaching method during hemodialysis training of nurses.
Trial report in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of flipped classroom (FC) model with traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model in the education of hemodialysis nurses.
methodEnrolled were 46 nurses who had received training from the hemodialysis center. These nurses were randomly assigned to FC or LBL groups, with 23 nurses in each group. FC group received the FC method, while LBL group was trained via the traditional LBL. After training, all nurses were examined for their theoretical knowledge, clinical practice skills and self-learning abilities. Furthermore, their satisfaction with the teaching mode was evaluated.
resultsFC group outperformed LBL group in the mastery of theoretical knowledge. In FC group, the scores in objective, subjective and overall questions were significantly higher than those in LBL group. FC group demonstrated a superior capability in clinical practices. FC group exhibited a superior performance over the LBL group in self-learning ability. Additionally, FC group showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the training method.
conclusionFC method benefits nurses in mastering knowledge about hemodialysis. It enhances their clinical practice skills and self-learning capabilities, and brings them with a higher degree of satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.