ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Social inclusion of families of children with Zika syndrome in light of Betty Neuman.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the stressors and reactions related to the knowledge and experiences of families of children with congenital Zika virus syndrome on social inclusion in light of Betty Neuman.
methodQualitative research, carried out in a hospital institution with nine mothers of children with Congenital Zika Syndrome. The data were collected between November and December 2020, from semi-structured interviews, and analyzed with the help of the IRAMUTEQ software and the manifest content analysis framework.
resultsThe analyses revealed three categories: Activities outside the home, highlighting the daily challenges faced outside the home, such as the lack of support in the educational system; Difficulties in adaptation, which highlighted physical and social barriers, such as the inadequacy of public spaces and the lack of social empathy; Knowledge about rights and inclusion, showing the lack of knowledge and uncertainty of families about their rights and social inclusion. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: The experiences and knowledge revealed the need for social interaction, adaptation, facing prejudice, seeking validity of rights and leading role in the context of social inclusion of these families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.