ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of re-operation on progression-free survival in patients with recurrent GBM: Experience in a tertiary referral center.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Surgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a multicenter perspective from the Italian society of neurosurgery (SINchNeurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Timing and Benefit of Early Versus Delayed Reoperation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Functional Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics in glioblastoma recurrence: advances in prediction, localization, and differentiation from treatment-related effects.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReoperation for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly debated topic within the medical community. GBM is known for its aggressive nature and poor prognosis, with most patients experiencing tumor recurrence despite initial treatments. Some studies suggest a survival benefit from a second surgery, while others do not. The aim of this study is to assess whether reoperation for recurrent GBM offers a survival benefit compared to patients who do not undergo re-resection and to identify the prognostic factors influencing patient selection for reoperation.
methodsThis study retrospectively reviewed medical records from the American University of Beirut Medical Center over a ten-year period, from 01/01/2012 to 01/01/2023. It included patients with recurrent GBM after initial surgical resection. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who underwent reoperation and those who received only medical management upon recurrence. Inclusion criteria included histologically confirmed GBM with previous tumor resection; patients who only had a biopsy were excluded. Time to progression and time to death were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curve, with differences between groups assessed by the log-rank test.
resultsAge categorization (≤50 vs. >50 years) and gender distribution did not significantly impact reoperation likelihood (p = 0.306 and p = 0.616, respectively). However, a notable association was observed with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≤3, indicating higher reoperation rates (p = 0.022). Tumor size grouping (≤5 vs. >5 cm) showed no significant association with reoperation status (p = 0.175). Similarly, whether the tumor was unifocal or multifocal and the extent of initial tumor resection (GTR vs. subtotal) did not demonstrate significant associations with reoperation (p = 0.086 and p = 0.351, respectively). Remarkably, complications following the initial surgery emerged as a significant factor associated with the decision not to undergo reoperation (p = 0.018). The most common complications following both initial and subsequent surgeries included DVT, weakness, seizures, and wound leakage and infection. The progression-free survival for patients who underwent reoperation was 15.9 months, whereas for those who did not undergo reoperation, it was 6.7 months (log-rank p < 0.001) The median post progression survival for patients who underwent reoperation upon recurrence was 5.9 months, compared to 5.1 months for those who did not undergo reoperation. (log-rank p = 0.065). The median overall survival for patients who did not undergo reoperation was 11 months, compared to 21 months for those who underwent reoperation (log-rank p < 0.001).
conclusionIn conclusion, reoperation for recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) appears to offer a survival benefit, as indicated by significantly longer disease-free intervals and higher progression-free and overall survival rates compared to patients who did not undergo reoperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.