ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Relative quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications in proteomic experiments with shared peptides: a weight-based approach.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ProteoForge: An Imputation-Aware Framework for Differential Proteoform Discovery in Bottom-Up Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationBottom-up mass spectrometry-based proteomics studies changes in protein abundance and structure across conditions. Since the currency of these experiments are peptides, i.e. subsets of protein sequences that carry the quantitative information, conclusions at a different level must be computationally inferred. The inference is particularly challenging in situations where the peptides are shared by multiple proteins or post-translational modifications. While many approaches infer the underlying abundances from unique peptides, there is a need to distinguish the quantitative patterns when peptides are shared.
resultsWe propose a statistical approach for estimating protein abundances, as well as site occupancies of post-translational modifications, based on quantitative information from shared peptides. The approach treats the quantitative patterns of shared peptides as convex combinations of abundances of individual proteins or modification sites, and estimates the abundance of each source in a sample together with the weights of the combination. In simulation-based evaluations, the proposed approach improved the precision of estimated fold changes between conditions. We further demonstrated the practical utility of the approach in experiments with diverse biological objectives, ranging from protein degradation and thermal proteome stability, to changes in protein post-translational modifications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The approach is implemented in an open-source R package MSstatsWeightedSummary. The package is currently available at https://github.com/Vitek-Lab/MSstatsWeightedSummary (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14662989). Code required to reproduce the results presented in this article can be found in a repository https://github.com/mstaniak/MWS_reproduction (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14656053).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.