ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2025
Severe Cholestasis Predicts Recurrent Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Following Liver Transplantation.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis patients awaiting liver transplantation.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
- Risk factors for recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis in pediatric liver transplant recipients: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- The pharmacological effects and therapeutic potential of flavonoids in digestive diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Management of primary sclerosing cholangitis: Current state-of-the-art.Hepatology communications · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrimary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) may reoccur following liver transplantation (LT), and the diagnosis established once imaging studies demonstrate the diagnostic cholangiographic appearance. To evaluate whether the development of recurrent PSC (rPSC) is associated with cholestasis soon after LT, we studied whether changes in hepatic biochemistry within the first 12 months were linked with the development of rPSC and graft loss.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 158 transplant recipients with PSC in Canada and 549 PSC transplant recipients from the United Kingdom. We evaluated serum liver tests within 12 months after LT and the subsequent development of a cholangiographic diagnosis of rPSC as a time-dependent covariate using Cox regression. Severe cholestasis was defined as either alkaline phosphatase > 3× upper limit of normal or total bilirubin > 100 μmol/L.
resultsPatients who developed rPSC were more likely to have severe cholestasis vs those without at 3 months (20.5% vs 8.2%, P = 0.011), at 6 months (17.9% vs 10.0%, P = 0.026), and 12 months (15.4% vs 7.8%, P = 0.051) in the Canadian cohort and at 12 months in the UK cohort (27.9% vs 12.6%, P < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis, development of severe cholestasis in the Canadian cohort at 3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.41, P = 0.046) and in the UK cohort at 12 months (HR = 3.141, P < 0.0001) was both associated with rPSC. Severe cholestasis at 3 months in the Canadian cohort was predictive of graft loss (HR = 3.88, P = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: The development of cholestasis within 3-12 months following LT was predictive of rPSC and graft loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.