ArticleJAMA network open2025
Survival Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Central Nervous System Disease.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-only metastatic breast cancer as a distinct clinical entity: evidence from national and institutional cohorts with implications for radiation therapy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Care pathways for asymptomatic brain metastases: comparison of healthcare utilization, costs, and outcomes in outpatient versus acute settings.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Too much, too soon?-trastuzumab deruxtecan in the first line metastatic setting.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of brain metastasis: volume II.Trends in cancer · 2026Review
- Evaluating survival trends over time in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases: a single center retrospective cohort study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Antibody drug conjugates in metastatic brain tumors: current landscape, therapeutic potential and challenges.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Anti‑HER2‑targeted therapies for the treatment of advanced HER2‑positive breast cancer with brain metastases (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Approximately one-third of patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive (ERBB2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop brain metastasis. It is unclear whether patients with disease limited to the central nervous system (CNS) have different outcomes and causes of death compared with those with concomitant extracranial metastasis. Objective: To assess overall survival (OS) and CNS-related mortality among patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer and a diagnosis of CNS disease by disease distribution (CNS only vs CNS plus extracranial metastasis). Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with ERBB2+ MBC and CNS disease, including parenchymal brain metastasis, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), or dural metastasis, who were treated between August 2010 and April 2022 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Data were analyzed between December 2023 and August 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival, estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and CNS-related mortality with cumulative incidence. Results: The cohort included 274 patients (272 [99.3%] female). The median age was 53.7 years (range, 28.7-87.4 years); 125 patients (45.6%) presented with de novo MBC. At CNS metastasis diagnosis, 73 (26.6%) presented with CNS-only disease. There was a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 0.2-12.0 years) from CNS disease diagnosis among those alive at the end of follow-up. Both OS and CNS-related death were significantly correlated with the pattern of presentation: OS was shortest among patients with LMD (1.24 years; 95% CI, 0.89-2.08 years) followed by those with extracranial metastasis (2.16 years; 95% CI, 1.87-2.58 years) and was longest among patients with parenchymal or dural CNS disease only (3.57 years; 95% CI, 2.10-5.63 years) (P = .001). Of 192 patients (70.1%) who died, 106 (55.2%) died of a CNS-related cause. The group with CNS-only disease remained at high risk of death from CNS causes, with a 3-year CNS-related death rate of 33.98% (95% CI, 22.84%-45.43%) and a 3-year death rate from other causes of 6.07% (95% CI, 1.93%-13.69%). On multivariable modeling for CNS-related death, LMD (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.19-2.93; P = .007) and treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.58; P = .01) were associated with CNS-related death. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, 55.2% of deaths among patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer and brain metastasis were due to CNS-related causes, with the greatest risk among patients with LMD. CNS-only presentation was associated with improved survival but a higher rate of CNS-related death, supporting an approach of aggressive local therapy for select patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.