ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025
Self-perceived knowledge, influencing factors and proposed educational interventions for diagnostic stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: The experience of Irish paediatric doctors.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLab users should display an understanding of microbiology tests and avoid inappropriate requests which may yield negative clinical consequences. Our research addressed diagnostic stewardship education and the perspectives of paediatric hospital doctors on their (1) self-perceived knowledge, (2) motivators for test ordering, (3) proposed educational interventions and (4) preferred teaching modalities.
methodsAn anonymous, mixed-methods, 34-item online questionnaire was distributed to paediatric doctors across three Irish hospital sites from March to May 2023. Descriptive statistics summarised Likert-scale responses and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended items. Subgroup analyses examined differences between consultants and non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs).
resultsThe analysis included 100 respondents (n = 45 consultants, n = 55 NCHDs, 24% response rate). Consultants scored higher than NCHDs in self-perceived knowledge (p < 0.001). Patient comorbidity, clinical status, local guidelines and accuracy of microbiological tests were the strongest motivators for test-ordering. Consultants were more likely to be influenced by accuracy (p = 0.03), costs (p = 0.01) and laboratory workload (p = 0.01). Only 27% reported formal teaching on diagnostic stewardship. NCHDs demonstrated increased willingness to engage in educational interventions (p = 0.024), and a comparatively higher interest in in-person teaching (p = 0.002) and gamification (p = 0.02). Respondents indicated a preference for formal guidelines on microbiology testing, in-person teaching, cost familiarisation and e-learning modules. Novel methods (peer-to-peer programmes, simulation and gamification) were less favoured. Dominant themes included; collaborative learning, increased microbiology presence, accessibility to education, barriers and administrative issues.
conclusionFormal diagnostic stewardship educational programmes should be integrated into post-graduate curriculums for both NCHDs and consultants. Focuses for educational interventions include; development of local diagnostic stewardship guidelines, teaching on the cost and accuracy of microbiology tests, senior supervision and role-modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39888580What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.