ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2025
Innovative landscapes in intraperitoneal therapy of ovarian cancer.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refining OVCAR-3 xenograft models of peritoneal carcinomatosis in nu/nu mice: Comparative intraperitoneal implantation strategies and the role of basement membrane matrix.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- The application of nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery systems in ovarian cancer.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Intraperitoneal administration of NK-92 improves survival in xenografts of early and established ovarian cancer models.PloS one · 2026Article
- A Preoperative Nomogram Integrating Clinical and Ultrasonic Features to Predict Extra-Pelvic Metastasis in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Is YouTube™ a Reliable Source of Information for the Current Use of HIPEC in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer?Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most prevalent gynecological malignancy, characterized by high mortality rates due to its late-stage diagnosis and frequent recurrence. The current standard of care for ovarian cancer is a combination of debulking surgery followed by the conventional mode of chemotherapy. Despite significant advances in therapeutic modalities, the overall survival rate of EOC continues to be poor, mainly because low concentrations of the chemotherapeutics reach the peritoneum, which is the primary site of ovarian cancer, leading to disease relapse. Here, intraperitoneal chemotherapy gains advantage due to its ability to deliver the drug molecules directly to the peritoneal cavity and provide localized and sustained effects. This is facilitated by the use of diverse kinds of nano or micron sized delivery systems, which help in transporting drugs, vaccines, antibodies and genes appropriately to the peritoneum for its desired function. This review article delves on how intraperitoneal delivery impacts the therapy of epithelial ovarian cancer spanning the conventional therapeutic modes to the recent nanoinnovations in chemotherapy, immunotherapy and gene therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39888579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.