ArticleActa diabetologica2025
Sarcopenia in independent oldest-old individuals treated for diabetes, with or without metformin: a case-control study.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sarcopenia in the Aging Process: Pathophysiological Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia is a common condition in the elderly, especially in diabetics (DM). Metformin (MTF), known to reduce glucose levels, can also be a therapeutic intervention in age-related diseases, although it may contribute to muscle loss.
objectivesTo compare the prevalence of sarcopenia among elderly people treated for DM, with or without MTF, and non-diabetic patients (NDM) and evaluate whether there is an association between the use of MTF and the development of sarcopenia.
methods194 independent elderly people over 80 years old were analyzed. Sarcopenia was defined by handgrip (HG), calf circumference (CC), and gait speed (GS). Non-parametric statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used.
resultsThe prevalence of DM was 24.7%, of which 56.25% used MTF. The median fasting blood glucose in the NDM and DM groups was 95 and 104 mg/dL. The median glycated hemoglobin in the NDM and DM groups was 5.7% and 6.4%. There was no statistical difference between the DM and NDM groups when comparing clinical characteristics, functionality, weight, physical tests, and mortality. The prevalence of sarcopenia was similar between NDM and DM (16.55% and 14.63%), with few cases of severe sarcopenia in both groups, without statistical differences. We did not find differences in the same variables when we analyzed NDM and DM using or not MTF. Survival curves showed no significant differences between patients with and without sarcopenia/severe sarcopenia.
conclusionsLong-lived people with well-controlled DM did not show significant differences concerning those without DM for the outcome of sarcopenia or death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39888448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.