Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888441›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

DeepLabv3 + method for detecting and segmenting apical lesions on panoramic radiography.

Fatmanur Ketenci Çay, Çağrı Yeşil, Oktay Çay, Büşra Gül Yılmaz, Fatma Hasene Özçini, Dilhan İlgüy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatmanur Ketenci ÇayDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey. fatmanur.ketenci@yeditepe.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9618-1082
Çağrı YeşilSADC Department, Huawei Türkiye R&D Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-2673
Oktay ÇayŞakir Gürkan Family Health Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4244-6571
Büşra Gül YılmazDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7316-6708
Fatma Hasene ÖzçiniDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9256-4753
Dilhan İlgüyDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-3425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to apply the DeepLabv3 + model and compare it with the U-Net model in terms of detecting and segmenting apical lesions on panoramic radiography.

methods260 panoramic images that contain apical lesions in different regions were collected and randomly divided into training and test datasets. All images were manually annotated for apical lesions using Computer Vision Annotation Tool software by two independent dental radiologists and a master reviewer. The DeepLabv3 + model, one of the state-of-the-art deep semantic segmentation models, was utilized using Python programming language and the TensorFlow library and applied to the prepared datasets. The model was compared with the U-Net model applied to apical lesions and other medical image segmentation problems in the literature.

resultsThe DeepLabv3 + and U-Net models were applied to the same datasets with the same hyper-parameters. The AUC and recall results of the DeepLabv3 + were 29.96% and 61.06% better than the U-Net model. However, the U-Net model gets 69.17% and 25.55% better precision and F1-score results than the DeepLabv3 + model. The difference in the IoU results of the models was not statistically significant.

conclusionsThis paper comprehensively evaluated the DeepLabv3 + model and compared it with the U-Net model. Our experimental findings indicated that DeepLabv3 + outperforms the U-Net model by a substantial margin for both AUC and recall metrics. According to those results, for detecting apical lesions, we encourage researchers to use and improve the DeepLabv3 + model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The DeepLabv3 + model has the poten tial to improve clinical diagnosis and treatment planning and save time in the clinic.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiography, PanoramicHumansSoftwareApical lesionsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39888441
PMCPMC11785705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.