ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
Application of novel strategies in chronic wound management with focusing on pressure ulcers: new perspective.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Nanotechnology: Revolutionizing Therapeutic Strategies Against Drug-Resistant Breast Cancer.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Linking compression mechanics and pressure redistribution in hybrid support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cutting-Edge Smart Hydrogel Platforms for Improved Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Targeting Leukopoiesis: Pharmacological and Biotechnological Strategies for the Treatment of Leukopenia.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Exploring mesenchymal stem cells as a novel therapeutic approach for HACEK endocarditis: a narrative review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Lessons Learned from Liver-on-Chip Platform.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Local Visible-Photocatalytic Production of Hydrogen and Warm Heat for Combination Treatment of Pressure Ulcer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Role of Nuclear Receptors on the Progression of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Modern therapeutic approaches for hepatic tumors: progress, limitations, and future directions.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- From bench to bedside: the research status and application opportunity of extracellular vesicles and their engineering strategies in the treatment of skin defects.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes: a novel approach to skin regeneration via signaling pathways activation.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells in bone marrow niche of patients with multiple myeloma: a double-edged sword.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Navigating the challenges: ultrasound innovations in brain glioma surgery.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- HWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invading blood cells, extracellular tissue, and soluble mediators all play important roles in the wound-healing process. There is a substantial global burden of disease and mortality attributable to skin defects that do not heal. About 1% to 2% of the population in industrialized nations suffers from chronic wounds that don't heal, despite healthcare breakthroughs; this condition is very costly, costing about $25 billion each year in the US alone. Amputation, infection (affecting as many as 25% of chronic wounds), sepsis, and dermal replacements are all consequences of conventional therapeutic approaches like growth factor therapy and diabetic foot ulcers account for 85% of lower limb amputations. Despite these obstacles, scientists are constantly looking for new ways to speed healing and close wounds. The unique immunomodulatory capabilities and multipotency of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have made them a potential therapeutic choice in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Animal models of wound healing have shown that MSCs can speed up the process by as much as 40% through enhancing angiogenesis, modulating inflammation, and promoting fibroblast migration. Clinical trials provide more evidence of their effectiveness; for instance, one RCT found that, after 12 weeks, patients treated with MSCs had a 72% smaller wound size than those in the control group. This review offers a thorough examination of MSCs by combining the latest research with preclinical evidence. Highlighting their potential to transform treatment paradigms, it delves into their biological properties, how they work during regeneration and healing, and therapeutic usefulness in controlling chronic wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39888392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.