ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Esophageal motility disorders: a gastroenterologists' perspective for radiologists.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal motility disorders are commonly encountered in the outpatient setting during the evaluation of difficulty swallowing. They typically present with symptoms of dysphagia to solids or liquids, non-cardiac chest pain, or regurgitation. Practitioners rely on both invasive and non-invasive testing to evaluate these complaints, often utilizing endoscopy, fluoroscopic evaluations, and functional esophageal motility testing to characterize symptoms into formal motility disorders, when able. Many of these tests complement each other and more than one is often needed to fully characterize a patient's symptoms. For the past fifteen years, gastroenterologists have primarily used the Chicago Classification for defining esophageal motility disorders by esophageal manometry and this classification scheme has evolved into its 4th iteration. The following paper will review the initial approach to patients presenting with obstructive esophageal symptoms and provide a working knowledge of the Chicago Classification system and additional motility testing used commonly by gastroenterologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39888381What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.