ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[First fracture in patients with osteoporosis : How does the "fracture career" of our patients with osteoporosis begin?]
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven that a primary osteoporotic fracture can result in subsequent fractures and that the precise etiology of the typical fracture cascade remains uncertain, it is pertinent to determine the initiating factor and the specific fracture involved in this cascade.
methodAll patients with a fracture of a long bone were consecutively screened over the 12-month study period. All participants were asked about existing risk factors (including previous fractures) in accordance with the applicable guidelines of the Umbrella Organization Osteology (DVO). The existing risk factors were employed to calculate the fracture risk and this formed the basis of the diagnosis and indications for treatment.
resultsA total of 613 patients were included in the study. Of the total number of patients 378 were deemed to require pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis. In this cohort 182 fractures were reported. Among the previous fractures distal radius fractures were the most common, occurring in 54 patients followed by fractures of the proximal femur (n = 40) and proximal humerus (n = 27). As anticipated, a breakdown of the data by gender revealed a different picture. In line with the incidences it can be seen that men have fewer distal radius fractures and more fractures close to the hip joint. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that women with a distal radius fracture have the potential to facilitate an early diagnosis and subsequent treatment for osteoporosis. In contrast, in men fractures in the region of the hip joint were the most common initial presentation, precluding the possibility of deriving an early indication of the presence of osteoporosis from previous fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.