Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888228›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Women's Menopausal Experiences in the UK: A Systemic Literature Review of Qualitative Studies.

Ailin Anto, Arunima Basu, Rania Selim, Andreas B Eisingerich

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07615777 (A Pilot Study Investigating the Effects of a Nutritional Supplement on Physiological and Metabolic Markers in 38-55-year-old Females), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07615777 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study Investigating the Effects of a Nutritional Supplement on Physiological and Metabolic Markers in 38-55-year-old Females

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2026 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsPerimenopausal Women, Body Composition ChangesArmsNutritional Supplement, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mental health consultations during the perimenopausal age range: a qualitative study of GP and patient experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ailin AntoFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4024-2237
Arunima BasuFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rania SelimFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andreas B EisingerichImperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenopause, defined as the cessation of periods for over 12 months, can have a profound impact on women in numerous ways. Understanding women's experiences of menopause can lead to improved care and support during this transformative period.

objectivesThe objective of this systematic review is to identify and summarise published qualitative studies that consider the lived experiences of women with menopause in the UK and to serve as a basis for future research in the field of menopause. SEARCH STRATEGY: EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched initially in March, and then updated in April 2024. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed papers with full text available in English, focused on women experiencing menopause in the UK, studies published from January 2000 to April 2024, qualitative or mixed methods study design with qualitative analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently performed title and abstract screening for eligibility. Conflicting opinions were resolved with a third author. Reviewers familiarised themselves with the data and coded the text line by line. Thematic analysis was utilised to place the codes into broader themes. All studies were assessed using an appropriate quality assessment tool. MAIN

resultsThirty-two studies were included in the review with 3462 participants involved. 173 primary codes were extracted and organised into subthemes and 3 overarching themes. These key themes were the biopsychosocial dimensions of menopause, understanding of menopause and strategies to manage menopause. DISCUSSION: Menopausal experiences documented in the literature are shaped by a range of individual and societal factors. While initiatives to support menopausal women are in place, this review also identifies key knowledge gaps and marginalised groups that would benefit from targeted research and interventions. It emphasises that menopause is not merely a collection of symptoms, but, for many, a pivotal life transition. A deeper understanding of these experiences allows us to more effectively support women through this significant phase of life.

conclusionsThis review concluded that the menopausal experience extends beyond physical symptoms, also affecting mental health, personal and professional life, and self-identity. Additionally, menopause is shaped by individual life experiences and various personal factors. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: The studies analysed in this review contain original data from women in the UK undergoing menopause. The qualitative data delves into their experiences with symptoms, accessing various sources of support from NHS and non-NHS sources as well as alternative therapies.

Indexed as

MenopauseFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdommenopauseperimenopausepost‐menopausalUK

Identifiers

PMID39888228
PMCPMC11780249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.