Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888086›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Influence of Workplace Bullying and Bystander Types on Speaking Up for Patient Safety Among Hospital Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sunghee Park, Kyoungja Kim, Sinhye Kim, Cheryl B Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunghee ParkSurgery Intensive Care Unit, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Kyoungja KimCollege of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9756-2103
Sinhye KimSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Cheryl B JonesSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1F1A1076006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore the influences of workplace bullying experiences, witnessing workplace bullying and bystander types on Speaking up for patient safety (SUPS) among hospital nurses.

designCross-sectional study.

methodsA survey was conducted in September 2021 using a structured questionnaire about workplace bullying experiences, witnessing workplace bullying, bystander types, and SUPS. The questionnaire was administered to 200 bedside nurses from two tertiary university hospitals in South Korea.

resultsOne hundred and ninety-nine responses were analysed. A hierarchical regression model, incorporating organisational factors, workplace bullying experiences, witnessing workplace bullying, and bystander types explained approximately 44.0% of the variance in nurses' SUPS. Witnessing workplace bullying and the perpetrator-facilitating bystander negatively influenced SUPS, whereas victim-defending bystander had a positive influence on SUPS.

conclusionsFindings suggest that witnessing workplace bullying and the bystander types of nurses working on patient care units are more impactful on nurses' SUPS than individual experiences of bullying. Notably, the victim-defending and perpetrator-facilitating bystander types were identified as key factors influencing SUPS. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Nurse managers should understand the roles of witnesses and bystanders working on a patient care unit, and how these roles may extend beyond traditional views of perpetrators and victims. Developing strategies to support and effectively manage witnesses and bystanders working on patient care units may promote positive SUPS behaviours among clinical nurses. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? Speaking up for patient safety (SUPS) in clinical settings is critical in maintaining and enhancing patient safety. However, a negative work environment, such as one that promotes workplace bullying may hinder nurses' willingness to engage in SUPS. Because many nurses involved in workplace bullying may be witnesses or bystanders rather than direct perpetrators or victims of such situations, this study explored the potential influences of workplace bullying, including the roles of witnesses and bystanders, on SUPS. What were the main findings? SUPS was influenced more by witnessing workplace bullying and specific bystander types, namely victim-defending and perpetrator-facilitating bystanders, than by workplace bullying experiences. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? These findings highlight the importance of addressing the roles of witnesses and bystanders in workplace bullying. Nurse managers should broaden their focus beyond perpetrators and victims to include the roles and views of all nursing staff within a department. By effectively managing witnesses and bystander types, they can foster an environment that enhances SUPS behaviours among nurses. REPORTING

methodThis study adhered to STROBE guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Indexed as

BullyingNursing Staff, HospitalPatient SafetyWorkplaceAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnairesassertivenessbehaviourbullyingclinical nursespatient safety

Identifiers

PMID39888086
PMCPMC12460945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.