ArticleCancer science2025
Genomic profiles of patients with skin melanoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic profiles of patients with skin melanoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Diverse radiotherapy fractionation in malignant melanoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating melanoma has dramatically improved patient prognosis. The genomic profiles of patients receiving ICI therapy would provide valuable information for disease management and treatment. We investigated the genomic profiles of patients with melanoma who had received ICI therapy and explored associations with clinical features and outcomes via a large-scale nationwide database in Japan (the C-CAT database). We identified 339 patients eligible for this study. The most frequent genetic mutations were found in the BRAF (27%), TERT (24%), and NRAS (19%) genes, and the most common copy number variations (CNVs) were in the CDKN2A (36%), CDKN2B (26%), and MTAP (19%) genes. Associations with high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high) status were significant for TERT (p < 0.001), NF1 (p < 0.001), ROS1 (p = 0.015), POLE (p = 0.045), and POLD1 (p = 0.008) mutations, along with older age (≥65 years, p = 0.036). Patients with multiple metastases (two or more) were more likely to have NOTCH3 mutations (p = 0.017) and be younger than 65 years (p = 0.024). In particular, as well as younger age, patients with brain metastases were more likely to harbor BRAF mutations (p < 0.001), while those with liver metastases were more likely to harbor NOTCH3 mutations (p < 0.001) but not CDKN2B CNVs (p = 0.041). Patients with NRAS mutations were less likely to respond to ICI therapy (p = 0.014) and exhibited shorter overall survival (p = 0.006). In this population, the frequency of BRAF mutations was lower than that in fair-skinned populations, but the associations between genomic profiles, clinical features, and outcomes were similar to those previously reported in fair-skinned populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.