Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888000›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology2025

Jointly modeling responses and omitted items by a competing risk model: A survival analysis approach.

Jinxin Guo, Xin Xu, Guanhua Fang, Zhiliang Ying, Susu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Jointly modeling responses and omitted items by a competing risk model: A survival analysis approach.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinxin GuoCollege of Science, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China.
Xin XuCollege of Science, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China.
Guanhua FangSchool of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiliang YingDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Susu ZhangDepartments of Psychology and Statistics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0751-6467

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2024KYQD43Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2024XJJS17Minzu University of China Academic Team Leadership Program Project Funding 2024QNYL44National Natural Science Foundation of China 12301376National Science FoundationShanghai Educational Development Foundation 23CGA02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Item response theory models are commonly adopted in educational assessment and psychological measurement. Such models need to be modified to accommodate practical situations when statistical sampling assumptions are violated. Omission is a common phenomenon in educational testing. In modern computer-based testing, we have not only examinees' responses but also their response times. This paper utilizes response time and develops a joint model of responses and response times. The new approach is analogous to those developed in survival analysis for dealing with right-censored data. In particular, a key ingredient is the introduction of the omission time (OT), which corresponds to the censoring time in survival analysis. By competing risk formulation, the proposed method provides an alternative narrative to how an item becomes answered versus omitted, depending on the competing relationship of response time and OT, so that the likelihood function can be constructed properly. The maximum likelihood estimator can be computed via the expectation-maximization algorithm. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and its robustness against various mis-specifications. The method was applied to a dataset from the PISA 2015 Science Test.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementModels, StatisticalPsychometricsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsReaction TimeSurvival Analysismissing dataomission timePISA 2015response timesurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID39888000
PMCPMC12516114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.