Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887949›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Single-Cell Hi-C Technologies and Computational Data Analysis.

Madison A Dautle, Yong Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-Cell Hi-C Technologies and Computational Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madison A DautleDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6827-4321

Funding

National Science Foundation DBI-2239350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell chromatin conformation capture (scHi-C) techniques have evolved to provide significant insights into the structural organization and regulatory mechanisms in individual cells. Although many scHi-C protocols have been developed, they often involve intricate procedures and the resulting data are sparse, leading to computational challenges for systematic data analysis and limited applicability. This review provides a comprehensive overview, quantitative evaluation of thirteen protocols and practical guidance on computational topics. It is first assessed the efficiency of these protocols based on the total number of contacts recovered per cell and the cis/trans ratio. It is then provided systematic considerations for scHi-C quality control and data imputation. Additionally, the capabilities and implementations of various analysis methods, covering cell clustering, A/B compartment calling, topologically associating domain (TAD) calling, loop calling, 3D reconstruction, scHi-C data simulation and differential interaction analysis is summarized. It is further highlighted key computational challenges associated with the specific complexities of scHi-C data and propose potential solutions.

Indexed as

ChromatinComputational BiologyData AnalysisSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsHumansChromatincell clusteringchromatin interactiondata sparsityscHi‐C

Identifiers

PMID39887949
PMCPMC11884588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.