Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887830›Full record

ArticleInfant mental health journal2025

Validating the parental reflective functioning questionnaire - infant version using a rasch model.

Anne Christine Stuart, Ida Egmose, Katrine Isabella Wendelboe, Johanne Smith-Nielsen, Mette Skovgaard Væver

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infant mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Christine StuartDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3829-9995
Ida EgmoseDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Katrine Isabella WendelboeDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-1775
Johanne Smith-NielsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-6335
Mette Skovgaard VæverDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9675-3423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parental reflective functioning is the parent's ability to reflect on the psychological processes in their child and in themselves as a parent. Recently, an infant version of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, PRFQ-I, has been developed and validated using confirmatory factor analyses. The present study aims to validate the PRFQ-I using a Rasch model in a sample of 531 Danish mothers at risk of depression and their infants aged 2-11 months. Our findings indicate that seven response categories were too many for the mothers to distinguish across all items. Prementalizing showed adequate psychometric properties, while Certainty of Mental States and Interest and Curiosity required recoding with 4 and 5 as the optimal scores, respectively. After rescoring, both subscales overall showed adequate psychometric properties. However, shortening Certainty of Mental States may be advisable due to local dependency between items 8 and 17. Additionally, items 2 and 14 ("I always know what my child wants" and "I always know why I do what I do to my child") may function better as a separate subscale. We recommend that scores on both Certainty of Mental States and Interest and Curiosity should be analyzed and interpreted in a curvilinear rather than linear manner.

Indexed as

MothersParentsAdultDenmarkDepressionFemaleHumansInfantMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesconstruct validityElterliche Reflektionsfähigkeitfonctionnement parental de réflexionfuncionamiento con reflexión del progenitorItem Response Theorieitem response theoryKonstruktvaliditätMentalisationMentalisierungmentalizaciónmentalizingparental reflective functioningRaschteoría de respuesta a puntosThéorie de Réponse à l'Item (IRT)validez estructuralvalidité conceptuelleالتأمل العقلي، الأداء التأملي للوالدين، نظرية الاستجابة للعنصر ، نموذج راش، صلاحية البناءメンタライジング、親の省察的機能、項目反応理論、Rasch、構成概念妥当性心智化父母反思功能结构效度项目反应理论

Identifiers

PMID39887830
PMCPMC12131118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.