ArticleMedical physics2025
Hybrid transformer-based model for mammogram classification by integrating prior and current images.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid deep learning-based prognostic classification of maxillary canine impaction on panoramic radiographs.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Robust artificial intelligence frameworks for lung cancer subtyping and malignancy detection on thoracic CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sequential Transfer Learning for Multi-Domain Breast Image Segmentation Using a Transformer-Enhanced Hybrid U-Net.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SwinCAMF-Net: Explainable Cross-Attention Multimodal Swin Network for Mammogram Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multimodal fusion of ultrasound images using HXM net for breast cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based classification of histological subtypes of invasive breast cancer using MRI contralateral breast texture features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Innovative Multi-View Strategies for AI-Assisted Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Hybrid transformer-based model for mammogram classification by integrating prior and current images.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Self-supervised learning and transformer-based technologies in breast cancer imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer screening via mammography plays a crucial role in early detection, significantly impacting women's health outcomes worldwide. However, the manual analysis of mammographic images is time-consuming and requires specialized expertise, presenting substantial challenges in medical practice. PURPOSE: To address these challenges, we introduce a CNN-Transformer based model tailored for breast cancer classification through mammographic analysis. This model leverages both prior and current images to monitor temporal changes, aiming to enhance the efficiency and accuracy (ACC) of computer-aided diagnosis systems by mimicking the detailed examination process of radiologists.
methodsIn this study, our proposed model incorporates a novel integration of a position-wise feedforward network and multi-head self-attention, enabling it to detect abnormal or cancerous changes in mammograms over time. Additionally, the model employs positional encoding and channel attention methods to accurately highlight critical spatial features, thus precisely differentiating between normal and cancerous tissues. Our methodology utilizes focal loss (FL) to precisely address challenging instances that are difficult to classify, reducing false negatives and false positives to improve diagnostic ACC.
resultsWe compared our model with eight baseline models; specifically, we utilized only current images for the single model ResNet50 while employing both prior and current images for the remaining models in terms of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), precision (PRE), specificity (SPE), F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC). The results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms the baseline models, achieving an ACC of 90.80%, SEN of 90.80%, PRE of 90.80%, SPE of 90.88%, an F1 score of 90.95%, and an AUC of 92.58%. The codes and related information are available at https://github.com/NabaviLab/PCTM.
conclusionsOur proposed CNN-Transformer model integrates both prior and current images, removes long-range dependencies, and enhances its capability for nuanced classification. The application of FL reduces false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rates (FNR), improving both SEN and SPE. Furthermore, the model achieves the lowest false discovery rate and FNR across various abnormalities, including masses, calcification, and architectural distortions (ADs). These low error rates highlight the model's reliability and underscore its potential to improve early breast cancer detection in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.