Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887753›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2025

Morphological Criteria for Staging Near-Hatching Embryos of the Domesticated Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) and Swan Goose (Anser cygnoides).

Bassel Arnaout, Kaylen Brzezinski, Benjamin Steventon, Daniel J Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bassel ArnaoutDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2659-7170
Kaylen BrzezinskiDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin SteventonDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7838-839X
Daniel J FieldDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-0352

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGS-D-567588-2022), and UKRI (MR/X015130/1).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying avian embryology necessitates reliable and precise staging tables-descriptions of embryonic features appearing during development that are used to approximate the extent of embryonic development from fertilisation to hatching. Staging tables for waterfowl (Anseriformes) have previously been established based on morphological features from fertilisation to approximately 10 days before hatching. Embryonic changes over the final 10 days of pre-hatching development have also been documented and proposed as useful staging criteria. However, the reliability of these changes-which focus on the size of the bill and middle toes-as useful staging criteria across different waterfowl breeds has not been fully examined. To evaluate the reliability of these criteria for staging near-hatching embryos, we examined 27 embryos of Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) and Swan Goose (Anser cygnoides). Comparisons with previously published data revealed that size variation within the same developmental stage across breeds is equivalent to within-breed variation across different stages, suggesting limited reliability of bill and middle toe size for staging waterfowl embryos. Consequently, we devised novel staging criteria for waterfowl based on four easily measurable morphological traits and show that these criteria allow correct stage identification with over 70% accuracy. Our results highlight the importance of quantifying staging accuracy for improving the reliability of embryonic staging tables.

Indexed as

DucksEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianGeeseAnimalsBeakAnseriformesduckembryonic developmentgoosestaging table

Identifiers

PMID39887753
PMCPMC11780221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.