Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887682›Full record

ArticleCancer2025

Outcomes and treatment patterns for stage I human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2010-2019.

Adrienne G Waks, Paolo Tarantino, Emily L Chen, Rachel A Freedman, Nancy U Lin, Nabihah Tayob, Carlos T Vallejo, Julieta Leone, Sara M Tolaney, Jose Pablo Leone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adrienne G WaksDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paolo TarantinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emily L ChenBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel A FreedmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nancy U LinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nabihah TayobDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Carlos T VallejoGrupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur, Neuquén, Argentina.
Julieta LeoneGrupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur, Neuquén, Argentina.
Sara M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-8671
Jose Pablo LeoneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8537-652X

Funding

Predicting Endocrine Therapy Response In Male Breast TumorsR37CA292075 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jose P. Leone, Philip M. Spanheimer · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA292075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of recurrence in patients with small, lymph node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers untreated with adjuvant chemotherapy/HER2-directed therapy is uncertain. To investigate this, the authors conducted a retrospective, population-based study of chemotherapy use and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) among patients with stage IA HER2-positive breast cancer.

methodsThe authors analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from patients diagnosed with stage IA HER2-positive breast cancer from 2010 to 2019. They examined the frequency of chemotherapy use by tumor size and hormone receptor (HR) status and applied multivariate logistic regression to assess the factors associated with receipt of chemotherapy. BCSS was evaluated and performed multivariable Cox regression was performed to evaluate the association between chemotherapy receipt and BCSS.

resultsAmong 12,896 patients, 74.0% had HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer, and 26.0% had HR-negative/HER2-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received by to 58.9% of patients, with lower utilization for those who were older, Hispanic or Asian/Pacific Islander, separated/divorced/widowed, or had a lower median household income. The median follow-up was 46 months. Among the patients who had pathologic T1 (pT1) microscopic, pT1a, or pT1b tumors, the 5-year BCSS rate was 97.6%-99.6% in those who had no evidence of chemotherapy receipt in the medical record versus 98.4%-100.0% in those who did receive chemotherapy. Among patients who had pT1c tumors and had no evidence of chemotherapy receipt, the 5-year BCSS rate was 92.1% for those with HR-negative/HER2-positive breast cancer and 96.0% for those with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients who had pT1c tumors and received chemotherapy had a 5-year BCSS rate of 96.7% in those with HR-negative/HER2-positive breast cancer and 98.7% in those with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer.

conclusionsIn this large, population-based study of patients with stage IA HER2-positive breast cancer, patients who had tumors ≤1 cm had excellent outcomes with or without chemotherapy. Patients with pT1c tumors had a greater increase in BCSS with the receipt chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancer‐specific survivalchemotherapyhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positiveinvasive disease‐free survival; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)

Identifiers

PMID39887682
PMCPMC11780567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.