Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887557›Full record

Trial reportEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2025

Oxytocin Amplifies Negative Response to Ambiguity in Adolescent Females With and Without Eating Disorders.

Victoria Burmester, Emerie Sheridan, Nikita Catalina Julius, Jordan Elliott, Olivia Thackeray, Dasha Nicholls

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria BurmesterDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-3640
Emerie SheridanDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-9548
Nikita Catalina JuliusDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0815-0351
Jordan ElliottDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0665-4019
Olivia ThackerayDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dasha NichollsDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7257-6605

Funding

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEating disorders (ED) typically emerge in adolescence, a critical period for brain development and peer bonding. Interpersonal difficulties-particularly social anxiety-frequently co-occur with ED. Oxytocin is a neuropeptide that modulates social cognition and linked to prosocial effects. To date, no study has investigated oxytocin's effects on negative interpretation bias toward ambiguous information in adolescents with ED.

methodsForty-eight female adolescents aged 16 to 17 years with and without EDs took part in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised, crossover trial investigating the effects of 24 IU intranasal oxytocin on negative interpretations of ambiguous scenarios. Participants and controls were tested twice, approximately one week apart.

resultsContrary to hypothesis, oxytocin increased negative interpretations overall (p = 0.019, large effect). Adolescent females with AN or BN made more negative interpretations than controls when presented with ambiguous information. There was no group effect for those who reached or did not reach threshold on an autism screen.

conclusionsThis study suggests adolescents with EDs interpret ambiguous information more negatively than controls and that oxytocin administration amplifies negative responses to ambiguity in adolescent females, including in controls. Research tools that effectively identify these biases would help to widen the scope of ED treatments for adolescents.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersOxytocinAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansOxytocinanorexia nervosabulimia nervosadevelopmentneuropsychologytreatment

Identifiers

PMID39887557
PMCPMC12171685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.