Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887485›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Taxonomic and phylogenetic biases in translocated angiosperm plant species across European countries.

Filipa Coutinho Soares, Maud Mouchet, Anne-Christine Monnet, Nadline Kjelsberg, Alfredo García Fernández, Alexandre Robert, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, Bruno Colas, François Sarrazin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Taxonomic and phylogenetic biases in translocated angiosperm plant species across European countries.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Filipa Coutinho SoaresCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-2538
Maud MouchetCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Anne-Christine MonnetGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
Nadline KjelsbergInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alfredo García FernándezÁrea de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Instituto de Investigación en Cambio Global, Universidad Rey Jan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Alexandre RobertCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7169-5522
Jean-Baptiste MihoubCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Bruno ColasCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
François SarrazinCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Funding

Biodiversa+ GA N°101003777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation translocations are a well-known conservation tool used to reverse the effects of local population extinctions and restore ecosystems. Compared with mammals and birds, plants are underrepresented in translocation programs, and little is known about the potential taxonomic and phylogenetic biases of plant translocation efforts. We aimed to assess how translocated plant species may contribute to the conservation of phylogenetic diversity (PD) among European countries. Focusing on angiosperms across 4 European countries with well-documented flora and comprehensive sampling of translocated plant species, we determined whether species translocations were related to species conservation status with binomial generalized linear mixed models with threat status as a binary response variable. Then, we evaluated the taxonomic and phylogenetic biases of translocated plant species relative to national floras based on PD and evolutionary distinctiveness (ED). To evaluate PD and ED, we constructed null models to assess the deviation of observed values from those expected under a scenario in which translocated species were randomly sampled from the species pool of national floras in each country. Although most species lacked conservation status assessment, plant translocations mainly targeted species with high extinction risk at national, European, and global scales. Although plant orders with a higher representativeness of translocated species also tended to have a higher representativeness of native species, the probability of species being translocated varied significantly across plant order, suggesting a significant taxonomic bias. Based on null models and considering all countries, PD and mean ED of translocated plants were higher than expected by chance in most countries. These results suggest that although translocation programs were implemented independently across countries, the diversity of translocated plant species is relevant to conserving PD from national to continental scales and restoring evolutionarily distinct species when these species succeed. We argue that PD indicators should be incorporated into translocation planning to restore target species' evolutionary trajectories and to contribute to conservation of PD.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesMagnoliopsidaPhylogenyEuropeangiospermasangiospermsconservation prioritizationconservation translocationsdistinción evolutivaevolutionary distinctivenesspriorización de la conservaciónriesgo de extinción de especiespecies extinction risktraslocaciones para la conservación

Identifiers

PMID39887485
PMCPMC12309630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.