ArticleMedical physics2025
TransAnaNet: Transformer-based anatomy change prediction network for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Machine learning in cancer imaging for enhanced precision in diagnosis and therapy.Discover computing · 2026Review
- Article
- A two-stage dual-task learning strategy for early prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdaptive radiotherapy (ART) can compensate for the dosimetric impact of anatomic change during radiotherapy of head-neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, implementing ART universally poses challenges in clinical workflow and resource allocation, given the variability in patient response and the constraints of available resources. Therefore, the prediction of anatomical change during radiotherapy for HNC patients is of importance to optimize patient clinical benefit and treatment resources. Current studies focus on developing binary ART eligibility classification models to identify patients who would experience significant anatomical change, but these models lack the ability to present the complex patterns and variations in anatomical changes over time. Vision Transformers (ViTs) represent a recent advancement in neural network architectures, utilizing self-attention mechanisms to process image data. Unlike traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), ViTs can capture global contextual information more effectively, making them well-suited for image analysis and image generation tasks that involve complex patterns and structures, such as predicting anatomical changes in medical imaging. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of using a ViT-based neural network to predict radiotherapy-induced anatomic change of HNC patients.
methodsWe retrospectively included 121 HNC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or radiation alone. We collected the planning computed tomography image (pCT), planned dose, cone beam computed tomography images (CBCTs) acquired at the initial treatment (CBCT01) and Fraction 21 (CBCT21), and primary tumor volume (GTVp) and involved nodal volume (GTVn) delineated on both pCT and CBCTs of each patient for model construction and evaluation. A UNet-style Swin-Transformer-based ViT network was designed to learn the spatial correspondence and contextual information from embedded image patches of CT, dose, CBCT01, GTVp, and GTVn. The deformation vector field between CBCT01 and CBCT21 was estimated by the model as the prediction of anatomic change, and deformed CBCT01 was used as the prediction of CBCT21. We also generated binary masks of GTVp, GTVn, and patient body for volumetric change evaluation. We used data from 101 patients for training and validation, and the remaining 20 patients for testing. Image and volumetric similarity metrics including mean square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), Dice coefficient, and average surface distance were used to measure the similarity between the target image and predicted CBCT. Anatomy change prediction performance of the proposed model was compared to a CNN-based prediction model and a traditional ViT-based prediction model.
resultsThe predicted image from the proposed method yielded the best similarity to the real image (CBCT21) over pCT, CBCT01, and predicted CBCTs from other comparison models. The average MSE, PSNR, and SSIM between the normalized predicted CBCT and CBCT21 are 0.009, 20.266, and 0.933, while the average Dice coefficient between body mask, GTVp mask, and GTVn mask is 0.972, 0.792, and 0.821, respectively.
conclusionsThe proposed method showed promising performance for predicting radiotherapy-induced anatomic change, which has the potential to assist in the decision-making of HNC ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.