Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887467›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2025

Management of Neonatal Hyperglycaemia in Sweden-A Survey Study.

Ludvig Henriksson Frithiof, Magnus Domellöf, Itay Nilsson Zamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ludvig Henriksson FrithiofDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-3205-4136
Magnus DomellöfDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Itay Nilsson ZamirDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-7991

Funding

Region VästerbottenSvenska LäkaresällskapetUmeå Universitet
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimNeonatal hyperglycaemia is associated with a multitude of adverse outcomes, including mortality and impaired neurological development. The aim of this study was to characterise the current management of neonatal hyperglycaemia in Swedish neonatal units.

methodsA digital survey was sent to 27 Swedish neonatal units providing care to preterm infants born before 32 completed gestational weeks.

resultsSixty-eight responses were collected from 21 different units. Thirty-two percent (22/68) of clinicians reported having a local treatment guideline for neonatal hyperglycaemia. Hyperglycaemia was defined as a glucose concentration above a value in the range of 8.0-10.0 mmol/L by 62.5% of clinicians, while 16.7% and 21.8% used a definition between 10.1 and 12.0 mmol/L and > 12 mmol/L, respectively. Intravenous glucose reduction was initiated at higher glucose concentrations by clinicians working at university hospital units (p = 0.006). Glucose concentration threshold for initiation of insulin treatment varied between 8 and 30 mmol/L. Three clinicians (3/35 (8.5%)) reported having experienced problems with frequent hypoglycaemia during ongoing insulin treatment.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates extensive differences in clinical practice regarding neonatal hyperglycaemia both within and between neonatal units in Sweden. Randomised controlled trials are needed to provide evidence for clinical guidelines and to improve and standardise the care of these infants.

Indexed as

HyperglycemiaInfant, Premature, DiseasesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Health Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInsulinIntensive Care Units, NeonatalSwedenInsulinhyperglycaemiainsulinNICUpreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID39887467
PMCPMC12066893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.