ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2025
Revisiting the Effect of Trypsin Digestion Buffers on Artificial Deamidation.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Antibody Structural Characterization and Quantification via Microdroplet Trypsin Digestion.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Challenges and Insights in Absolute Quantification of Recombinant Therapeutic Antibodies by Mass Spectrometry: An Introductory Review.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deamidation of asparagine and glutamine residues occurs spontaneously, is influenced by pH, temperature, and incubation time, and can be accelerated by adjacent amino acid residues. Incubation conditions used for proteolytic digestion in bottom-up proteomic studies can induce significant deamidation that affects results, either knowingly or unknowingly. This has prompted studies into modifications to common trypsin digestion protocols to minimize chemical deamidation, including shorter incubation times and specific lysis buffers. Prior work suggested ammonium acetate at pH 6 to minimize chemical deamidation, but this buffer has compatibility issues with trypsin digestion and common assays (e.g., bicinchoninic acid assays). Here, we re-evaluated former comparisons of Tris-HCl, ammonium bicarbonate, and triethylammonium bicarbonate buffers for the amount of artificial, chemically induced deamidation generated in a standard bottom-up proteomics workflow, and we added an evaluation of three commonly used and biologically compatible buffers, HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), EPPS (3-[4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]propane-1-sulfonic acid), and PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Our findings show that HEPES exhibited the least amount of artificial deamidation and is a reasonable choice for general proteomic experiments, especially for studies considering N-glycosylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.