ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Comparison of the Filamentous Fungi Library v4.0 MALDI Biotyper Platform vs MSI-2 performance for identifying filamentous fungi from liquid cultures.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Mycelium Transfer Method Coupled with MALDI-TOF MS for Rapid Identification of Filamentous Fungi.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of multiple extraction and inactivation methods for the rapid identification of filamentous fungi using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative performance of Filamentous Fungi 4.0 and Mass Spectrometry Identification 2.0 databases for Aspergillus spp.: identification using a simplified protein extraction method.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correct, rapid, and reliable filamentous fungi identification is crucial for timely diagnosis and therapy. We compared the performance of the FFLv4.0 MALDI Biotyper and MSI-2 to identify filamentous fungi from clinical isolates. We analyzed 307 clinical isolates of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.