Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887051›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2025

A unified combination framework for dependent tests with applications to microbiome association studies.

Xiufan Yu, Linjun Zhang, Arun Srinivasan, Min-Ge Xie, Lingzhou Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiufan YuDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Linjun ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Arun SrinivasanGSK plc, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Min-Ge XieDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Lingzhou XueDepartment of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8252-0637

Funding

Collaborative Research: DMS/NIGMS 2: New statistical methods, theory, and software for microbiome dataR01GM152812 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Lingzhou Xue, Xiufan Yu · 2023 to 2026
$1.2M
DMS/NIGMS 1: Disease gene discovery by Markovian gene networkR01GM157610 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI Sijian Wang, JINCHUAN XING · 2024 to 2026
$591k
National Science Foundation DMS-1811552NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152812NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM157610NIH HHS 1R01GM152812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a novel meta-analysis framework to combine dependent tests under a general setting, and utilize it to synthesize various microbiome association tests that are calculated from the same dataset. Our development builds upon the classical meta-analysis methods of aggregating P-values and also a more recent general method of combining confidence distributions, but makes generalizations to handle dependent tests. The proposed framework ensures rigorous statistical guarantees, and we provide a comprehensive study and compare it with various existing dependent combination methods. Notably, we demonstrate that the widely used Cauchy combination method for dependent tests, referred to as the vanilla Cauchy combination in this article, can be viewed as a special case within our framework. Moreover, the proposed framework provides a way to address the problem when the distributional assumptions underlying the vanilla Cauchy combination are violated. Our numerical results demonstrate that ignoring the dependence among the to-be-combined components may lead to a severe size distortion phenomenon. Compared to the existing P-value combination methods, including the vanilla Cauchy combination method and other methods, the proposed combination framework is flexible and can be adapted to handle the dependence accurately and utilizes the information efficiently to construct tests with accurate size and enhanced power. The development is applied to the microbiome association studies, where we aggregate information from multiple existing tests using the same dataset. The combined tests harness the strengths of each individual test across a wide range of alternative spaces, enabling more efficient and meaningful discoveries of vital microbiome associations.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicMicrobiotaModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationHumansbootstrappingcombination of P-valuesdependent P-valuesefficiencymicrobiome association studies

Identifiers

PMID39887051
PMCPMC11783248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.