Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886936›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025

Frailty and outcomes in adults undergoing systemic anticancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jessica Pearce, Sally Martin, Sophie Heritage, Emma G Khoury, Joanna Kucharczak, Thitikorn Nuamek, David A Cairns, Galina Velikova, Suzanne H Richards, Andrew Clegg and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tumor burden and frailty: No association in liver transplantation candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica PearceLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6553-2652
Sally MartinLeeds Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0002-4662-3417
Sophie HeritageRoyal Papworth Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0AY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-2804
Emma G KhouryAcademic Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2559-2762
Joanna KucharczakDepartment of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0478-790X
Thitikorn NuamekClinical Oncology, The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0070-0413
David A CairnsLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2338-0179
Galina VelikovaLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1899-5942
Suzanne H RichardsLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-0569
Andrew CleggAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5972-1097
Alexandra GilbertLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9142-1227

Funding

Cancer Research UK C7852-A25447Core Clinical Trials Unit InfrastructureNational Institute for Health Research NIHR 302560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is increasingly recognized that frailty should be assessed and considered in treatment decision making in patients with cancer. This review and meta-analysis synthesizes existing evidence evaluating the association between baseline frailty and systemic anticancer treatment outcomes in adults with cancer.

methodsFive databases were systematically searched from database inception to January 2023 to identify prognostic factor studies (cohort or case-control design) reporting the associations between validated frailty assessments (pretreatment) and follow-up outcomes in adults with solid-organ malignancy undergoing systemic anticancer treatment. Risk of bias was assessed via Quality of Prognosis Studies in Systematic Reviews tool. Where appropriate, associations between frailty and outcomes (survival, toxicity, treatment tolerance, functional decline/quality of life, and hospitalization) were synthesized in meta-analysis and presented as forest plots.

resultsA total of 58 studies met inclusion criteria. They were undertaken in a range of tumor sites and mainly in older patients and advanced and/or palliative disease settings. Most had low or moderate risk of bias. Nine frailty assessment tools were evaluated. Four outcomes were synthesized in meta-analysis, which demonstrated the prognostic value of 2 tools: Geriatric-8 (survival, treatment tolerance, hospitalization) and Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (survival, toxicity, treatment tolerance). Overall pooled estimates indicate that frailty conveys an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 2.00), toxicity (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.68), treatment intolerance (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.32 to 2.12), and hospitalization (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.32 to 2.83).

conclusionSimple, brief frailty assessments including Geriatric-8 and Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 are prognostic for a range of important outcomes in patients undergoing systemic anticancer treatment. Risk estimates should be used to support shared decision making.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsFrailtyNeoplasmsAdultGeriatric AssessmentHospitalizationHumansPrognosisQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39886936
PMCPMC12232047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.