Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886914›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Relapse detection in the Danish surveillance program of patients with clinical stage I seminoma: a nationwide study.

Niklas B Lindahl, Jakob Lauritsen, Thomas Wagner, Gedske Daugaard, Mikkel Bandak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk-adapted management in stage I testicular germ-cell tumors: long-term outcomes from a single-center cohort (1994-2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niklas B LindahlDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0002-9524-8131. niklas.lindahl@regionh.dk
Jakob Lauritsen1. Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9985-174X
Thomas WagnerDepartment of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0256-0074
Gedske DaugaardDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-9180
Mikkel BandakDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3475-9675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeActive surveillance is a recommended management strategy for patients with clinical stage I (CSI) seminoma. This study aims to identify patterns of relapse detection methods in an unselected population-based cohort of CSI patients and provide evidence for a risk-adapted follow-up program. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 924 patients with CSI seminoma were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. Retrospectively collected clinical data were used for descriptive analyses of patterns in detection methods. Additionally, we explored a risk-adapted surveillance approach based on recently identified risk factors for relapse, classifying patients into low- and non-low-risk groups.

resultsAt 60 months, the 5-year cumulative relapse risk was 16%, with 146 relapses during surveillance. Relapses were detected by imaging alone in 71% of cases, imaging combined with elevated serum tumor markers (STMs) in 18%, isolated elevation of STMs in 8%, and by self-referral due to symptoms in 3%. No relapses were detected by abnormal findings at a physical examination. In total, 134 (92%) relapses were localized to retroperitoneal lymph nodes, primarily without additional spread. The 5-year relapse risk in patients with low risk of relapse was 9% compared to 28% in patients in the non-low-risk group.

interpretationThis study highlights that the surveillance program can detect relapses at an early stage. Reduction of visits and omission of routine physical examinations can safely be considered for patients with a low risk of relapse, while further research is needed to optimize follow-up and treatment for patients at higher risk of relapse.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalSeminomaTesticular NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorDenmarkFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsWatchful WaitingBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39886914
PMCPMC11811535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.