Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886744›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2024

Prediction of inpatient mortality in hospitalised children in low- and middle-income countries: An external validation of paediatric mortality risk scores.

Daniella Brals, Ananda Pradhan, Amelie von Saint Andre-von Arnim, Assaf P Oron, Moses Ngari, Narshion Ngao, Ezekiel Mupere, Mohammod J Chisti, Christopher Lwanga, Farzana Afroze and 4 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniella Brals *Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ananda Pradhan *Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amelie von Saint Andre-von ArnimDepartments of Paediatrics and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle Children's, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Assaf P OronInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Moses NgariChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Narshion NgaoChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ezekiel MupereChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mohammod J ChistiChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Christopher LwangaChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Farzana AfrozeChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Robert BandsmaChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Judd L WalsonChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
James A BerkleyChildhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network, Nairobi, Kenya.
Wieger VoskuijlAmsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk prediction tools for acutely ill children have been developed in high- and low-income settings, but few are validated or incorporated into clinical guidelines. We aimed to assess the performance of existing paediatric early warning scores for use in low- and middle-income countries using clinical data from a recent large multi-country study in Africa and South-Asia. Methods: We used data (children across three nutritional strata) from the Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) Network cohort study (n = 3101). We assessed 10 scores where similar predictor variables were available in the CHAIN cohort. We evaluated performance using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) (primary outcome), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio (secondary outcomes). Results: Most scores showed poor discrimination, and all scores had low sensitivity. The paediatric early death index for Africa (AUC = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.77-0.83), respiratory index of severity in children (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.74-0.81), and respiratory index of severity in children in Malawi (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.75-0.82) showed acceptable/good overall discrimination. Among children without wasting, most scores had acceptable/good performance, some even excellent. Poor discrimination was found for most scores among children with moderate and severe wasting or kwashiorkor. Conclusions: All scores demonstrated lower validation performance than originally reported. Among children without wasting, most risk prediction scores performed acceptably whilst in malnourished children they performed poorly. There is a need for a malnutrition specific score. Further research is needed on specific actions in responding to scores. Integration into future guidelines will require acknowledging staffing, resources and workflows.

Indexed as

Child, HospitalizedChild MortalityDeveloping CountriesEarly Warning ScoreHospital MortalityAfricaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID39886744
PMCPMC11683851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.