Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886714›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Rates and Predictors of Malignancy in Bethesda III and IV Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study.

Eman Z Azzam, Marwa A Salah, Waleed A Aboelwafa, Rawan M Essam, Maha E Bondok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eman Z AzzamInternal Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, EGY.
Marwa A SalahInternal Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, EGY.
Waleed A AboelwafaHead and Neck Surgery, Alexandria University Teaching Hospital, Alexandria, EGY.
Rawan M EssamInternal Medicine, Alexandria Main University Hospital, Alexandria, EGY.
Maha E BondokInternal Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThyroid nodules, based on high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS), are among the most common endocrine abnormalities that affect the general population because of their high estimated prevalence rates. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a safe, cost-effective modality to differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC), thus avoiding unnecessary surgery. However, categories III and IV of BSRTC remain a controversial issue in clinical practice, encompassing a wide range of risks of malignancy. Hence, our study aimed to assess the malignancy rates of thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda III and IV categories as evidenced by post-thyroidectomy histopathology; study the association between the American College of Radiologists Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) score of these two categories and the postoperative histopathological analysis; and study the predictors of malignancy in these two categories. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective study was conducted on 242 patients who underwent FNAC throughout the study from December 2022 to August 2023. All patients who performed FNAC were primarily subjected to history taking, clinical examination, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroid autoantibodies (antithyroglobulin (anti-TG) and thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO Abs)), and HRUS with a further categorization of thyroid nodules according to the ACR-TIRADS scoring system. The cytological aspirates were categorized according to the BSRTC. Patients with Bethesda III and IV categories were resorted to surgery according to clinical factors, sonographic features, and patients' preferences.

resultsA total of 17 cases with Bethesda III and 65 patients with Bethesda IV were included. Seventy-one out of 82 patients (86.6%) underwent surgical intervention. The proportions of malignant nodules classified as TIRADS-2, TIRADS-3, TIRADS-4, and TIRADS-5 scores were 0.0, 4.5 (n=1/22), 22.7 (n=5/22), and 72.7% (n=16/22), respectively. The rate of malignancy was 18.2% (n=2/11) among class III and 33.3% (n=20/60) among class IV-categorized Bethesda thyroid nodules. In univariate logistic regression analysis, age ≥ 40 years, body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m², higher TSH, positive anti-TG antibodies, radiation exposure, irregular borders, marked hypoechogenicity, ill-defined margins, microcalcifications, solid consistency, taller than wide growth, solitary nodule, and nodule size > 2 cm, and suspicious lymph nodes were associated with higher malignancy risk. In multivariate regression analysis, positive anti-TG Abs, radiation exposure, irregular borders, taller-than-wide growth, hypoechogenicity, calcifications, and solid consistency remain to be independent predictors of malignancy.

conclusionThe malignancy rates of Bethesda class III and IV nodules in this study met the estimated malignancy risk proposed by BSRTC. TIRADS scores 4 and 5 confer a higher risk of malignancy in Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules. Positive thyroglobulin antibodies and radiation exposure are independent factors of malignancy in Bethesda III and IV nodules. Moreover, ultrasound features, including irregular borders, taller-than-wider growth, hypoechogenicity, calcifications, and solid consistency, are associated with increased malignancy risk and should be considered in the surgical selection of patients.

Indexed as

bethesda category iiibethesda category ivbethesda risk cytopathological classificationfnacindeterminate nodulespost-thyroidectomy histopathologythyroid nodulesti-rads

Identifiers

PMID39886714
PMCPMC11779563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.