Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886711›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Nurses' Recognition and Care of Thirst in Perioperative Patients in Japan.

Mariko Hanashiro, Mayu Fukuda, Tomoko Akase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariko HanashiroDepartment of Biological Science and Nursing, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, JPN.
Mayu FukudaDepartment of Biological Science and Nursing, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, JPN.
Tomoko AkaseDepartment of Biological Science and Nursing, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative thirst is common and distressing to patients, as is pain and nausea. The causes of postoperative thirst are complex and include factors like preoperative fasting, perioperative fluid loss, and certain anesthesia medications. Effective care for postoperative thirst has been shown in post-anesthesia care units (PACUs), but many Japanese hospitals lack PACUs or do not address thirst in their PACUs. Therefore, cooperation between the operating room and ward nurses is crucial for providing proper care for postoperative thirst. The purpose of this study was to clarify the actual situation of ward nurses' and operating room nurses' recognition and care of thirst in postoperative patients.

methodsThe study was a cross-sectional survey conducted using a self-administered questionnaire based on previous research. Study participants were nurses working in surgical wards and operating rooms of two university-affiliated hospitals. The survey items included (1) participants' characteristics, (2) recognition of thirst in perioperative patients, and (3) actual care provided to perioperative patients for thirst. Data were collected between September and October 2022 and subjected to descriptive and bivariate analysis.

findingsA total of 298 ward nurses and 43 operating room nurses were included in the study. Among the observation items, thirst was observed least frequently. Both ward nurses and operating room nurses recognized patient thirst based on complaints rather than physical observations. Sharing of information about patient thirst differed between ward nurses and operating room nurses. None of the participants used scales or scores to evaluate thirst. The most common postoperative care in the ward was "They were asked to do a mouthwash with water," while in the operating room, it was "Placed a moistened gauze against the mouth." The reasons for selecting a particular type of care were primarily based on "Because of the patient's wishes" and "I think it is effective," while the reasons for not providing care included "Because there is an instruction not to drink water," "Due to the possibility of aspiration," "I don't have the knowledge and don't know how," and "I'm busy with other work."

conclusionsRegarding the recognition of thirst, both ward nurses and operating room nurses recognized patient thirst most often when the patient directly reported feeling thirsty. They relied more on patients' verbal complaints than physical observations to recognize thirst. Both surgical ward nurses and operating room nurses provided care based on their experience.

Indexed as

nursing researchpost-anesthesia care unitpostoperative thirstquality-of-carerecognition

Identifiers

PMID39886711
PMCPMC11779687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.