Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886694›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

Outcomes of a pilot randomized clinical trial testing brief interventions to increase HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among rural people who inject drugs attending syringe services programs.

Hilary L Surratt, Sarah Brown, Abby L Burton, Will Cranford, Laura C Fanucchi, Christie Green, Stephanie M Mersch, Rebecca Rains, Philip M Westgate

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05037513 (Integrated PrEP Interventions for People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Kentucky), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05037513 nacompletednot on this map

Integrated PrEP Interventions for People Who Inject Drugs in Rural Kentucky

TypeinterventionalSponsorHilary L Surratt, PhDRan2021 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsHIV PreventionArmsSBCM-PrEP, CDC-PrEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hilary L SurrattCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, #105, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-7840
Sarah BrownAppalachian Regional Healthcare, Barbourville, KY, USA.
Abby L BurtonDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Will CranfordDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Laura C FanucchiDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-2399
Christie GreenCumberland Valley District Health Department, Manchester, KY, USA.
Stephanie M MerschDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Rebecca RainsKnox County Health Department, Barbourville, KY, USA.
Philip M WestgateDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Integrated PrEP Interventions for People Who Inject Drugs in Rural KentuckyR34DA053140 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SURRATT, HILARY L · 2021 to 2023
$655k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA053140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Kentucky is one of seven states with high, sustained rural HIV transmission tied to injection drug use. Expanding access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been endorsed as a key HIV prevention strategy; however, uptake among people who inject drugs (PWID) has been negligible in rural areas. Syringe services programs (SSPs) have been implemented throughout Kentucky's Appalachian region, providing an important opportunity to integrate PrEP services. Objectives: The primary objective was to examine preliminary efficacy and effect sizes of the study interventions on PrEP initiation among HIV-negative PWID. Design: Parallel group randomized controlled trial. Methods: Eighty participants were enrolled from two rural SSP locations in southeastern Kentucky. Following informed consent, participants completed a baseline interview, and were randomized to the intervention comparators. The primary endpoint was PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed PrEP prescription, within the 6-month study period. Analyses employed intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol approaches. Results: In total, 77/80 enrollees (96.2%) completed at least one session of their assigned intervention, regardless of trial arm. Seventy (87.5%) were linked to the embedded PrEP provider for the initial clinical visit; 38 (47.5%) completed a follow-up clinical visit with the provider, 22 (27.5%) were issued a prescription, and 7 (8.8%) initiated PrEP during the study period. We observed a 12.1% difference (14.6% vs 2.5%; ITT) and 12.8% difference (15.4% vs 2.6%; per protocol) in the primary outcome (PrEP initiation), in favor of the experimental intervention. Conclusion: This pilot trial established proof of concept for integrated PrEP care within SSPs in rural areas, and demonstrated a clinically meaningful difference in PrEP initiation between interventions, which warrants examination in a larger trial. Rates of early care discontinuation indicate a need for ongoing patient engagement strategies and implementation support for community SSPs. Trial registration: Prospective registration with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05037513 (registered August 5, 2021).

Indexed as

harm reductionHIV preventionpeople who inject drugspre-exposure prophylaxisstrengths-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID39886694
PMCPMC11780651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.