Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886686›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

DFMA: an improved DeepLabv3+ based on FasterNet, multi-receptive field, and attention mechanism for high-throughput phenotyping of seedlings.

Liangquan Jia, Tao Wang, Xiangge Li, Lu Gao, Qiangguo Yu, Xincheng Zhang, Shanlin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liangquan Jia *School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Tao Wang *School of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Xiangge LiSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Lu GaoSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Qiangguo YuSchool of Electronic Information Engineering, Huzhou College, Huzhou, China.
Xincheng ZhangInstitute of Crop Science, Huzhou Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Huzhou, China.
Shanlin MaInstitute of Crop Science, Huzhou Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Huzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of plant phenotyping research, understanding plant genetic information and growth trends has become crucial. Measuring seedling length is a key criterion for assessing seed viability, but traditional ruler-based methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address these limitations, we propose an efficient deep learning approach to enhance plant seedling phenotyping analysis. We improved the DeepLabv3+ model, naming it DFMA, and introduced a novel ASPP structure, PSPA-ASPP. On our self-constructed rice seedling dataset, the model achieved a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 81.72%. On publicly available datasets, including Arabidopsis thaliana, Brachypodium distachyon, and Sinapis alba, detection scores reached 87.69%, 91.07%, and 66.44%, respectively, outperforming existing models. The model generates detailed segmentation masks, capturing structures such as the embryonic shoot, axis, and root, while a seedling length measurement algorithm provides precise parameters for component development. This approach offers a comprehensive, automated solution, improving phenotyping analysis efficiency and addressing the challenges of traditional methods.

Indexed as

DeepLabv3+deep learningDFMAplant seedling phenotyping analysisplant seedlings

Identifiers

PMID39886686
PMCPMC11779734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.