Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886651›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Psychosocial Determinants and Outcomes of Expedited Liver Transplant Evaluations: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Katherine M Cooper, Padmavathi Srivoleti, Alessandro Colletta, Doris Tripp, Savant Mehta, Babak Movahedi, Deepika Devuni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine M CooperDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6030-4773
Padmavathi SrivoletiDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Alessandro CollettaDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Doris TrippDivision of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Savant MehtaDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Babak MovahediDivision of Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Deepika DevuniDepartment of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the burden of chronic liver disease and the demand for liver transplants (LT) grows, understanding the interplay between access to care and patient outcomes is increasingly important. In this study, we explored patient characteristics and transplant outcomes in patients undergoing LT evaluations, with a focus on identifying risk factors for expedited LT evaluation. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent LT evaluation for deceased donor LT between October 2017 and July 2021. Patients were categorized by context: expedited (inpatient) and routine (outpatient) LT evaluation groups. The outcome measures included waitlist status, pre-LT mortality, and post-LT complications. Results: Of 602 patients, 26% underwent expedited LT evaluation. Patients who underwent expedited evaluation were more likely to have a history of ascites ( Conclusions: Expedited LT evaluations were associated with more severe illness and higher pre-LT mortality; however, post-LT outcomes were comparable with those of routine evaluations. Identifying psychosocial risk factors may enhance equity and access to LT evaluations, particularly for women who face unique challenges in this context.

Identifiers

PMID39886651
PMCPMC11781761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.