Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886627›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy's impact on complications following radical cystectomy.

Mounish Nuthalapati, Arun Ramdas Menon, Vivek Dadasaheb Patil, Sheejamol Velickakathu Sukumaran, Prashanth Reddy Yensani, Shashank Agrawal, Nikhil Krishna Haridas, Haridas Nair, Sohini Chandra Ganesuni, Nivedita Suresh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mounish Nuthalapati *Department of Urologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Arun Ramdas Menon *Department of Urologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Vivek Dadasaheb PatilDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Sheejamol Velickakathu SukumaranDepartment of Medical Biostatistics, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Prashanth Reddy YensaniDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Shashank AgrawalDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Nikhil Krishna HaridasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Haridas NairDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Sohini Chandra GanesuniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Nivedita SureshDepartment of Uro-Pathology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Bindu Mangalath RajammaDepartment of Uro-Pathology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Ginil Kumar PooleriDepartment of Urologic Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite level 1 evidence supporting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), its adoption is hindered by concerns about toxicity and detrimental impact on post-RC complications. We retrospectively reviewed post-RC complications at a tertiary care hospital, particularly assessing impact of NACT. Methods: Data from the institutional bladder cancer database were retrieved for patients aged ≥18 with MIBC (≥American Joint Committee on Cancer Clinical Stage T2), treated with RC between May 2013 and July 2023. Exclusions were nonurothelial histology, salvage cystectomy, and palliative intent. Data abstracted included patient characteristics, NACT administration, surgery, and outcomes. Patients were divided into two groups based on NACT and compared. Complications were categorized as early (≤30 days) or late (31-90 days) and graded. Statistical analysis set significance at Results: Of 154 patients who underwent RC, 33 were excluded due to non-MIBC, nonurothelial histology, or salvage cystectomy. The 121 patients analyzed had a mean age of 64 years and a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.9. Among them, 61 received NACT and 60 did not. There was no significant difference between the NACT+RC and RC-only groups in overall complication rates (85.3% vs. 75.0%, Conclusion: In our study of MIBC patients managed at a tertiary care institute in India, NACT administration did not increase postoperative complications.

Identifiers

PMID39886627
PMCPMC11778685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.