ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
Efficacy and safety of
Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Primary hyperoxaluria (PH), a rare autosomal recessive disorder, results in defective metabolism of oxalate, leading to increased oxalate levels. Methods: A literature review was conducted for synthesizing the evidence from RCTs on Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL until January 2023. The outcomes were pooled using mean difference (MD) for continuous data and odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data along with confidence interval (CI). The systematic review is registered with Prospero ID CRD42023404421. Results: We included five RCTs with 208 patients. The pooled analysis did not favor Conclusion:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.