ReviewTexas Heart Institute journal
Coronary Myocardial Bridge Updates: Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options.
Review in Texas Heart Institute journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Article
- Predicting recurrent chest pain in patients with myocardial bridging using explainable machine learning: a multicenter study integrating CT-derived functional and inflammatory imaging biomarkers.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Pantoprazole-induced anaphylactic asthma and Type I Kounis syndrome: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Coexistence of Coronary Artery Ectasia and Myocardial Bridging: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Cardiac Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Myocardial Bridging: A Scoping Review of the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Coronary Artery Spasm: From Physiopathology to Diagnosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial bridging is a frequent anomaly of the heart in humans and other animals. A myocardial bridge is typically characterized by the systolic narrowing seen with traditional catheter angiography, but this abnormality is not by itself a sign of ischemia or the need for intervention. In particular, transient spontaneous angina must be corroborated by reproducible narrowing during acetylcholine testing; this narrowing occurs during resting conditions and is responsive to nitroglycerin administration. Ischemia in myocardial bridging can result from acquired arterial wall disease (coronary artery atherosclerotic disease) or from instances of coronary spasm. Clinical evaluation should seek to identify baseline features such as myocardial bridge thickness (by using computerized axial tomography or intravascular ultrasonography) and the severity of systolic compression or reproducible spasticity (by administering acetylcholine). Nuclear myocardial scintigraphy is usually negative in patients with isolated myocardial bridging. Spastic coronary hyperactivity must be treated initially with antispasmodic medications, such as calcium channel blockers and nitrates, rather than by percutaneous stent placement or bypass surgery. Only exceptionally prolonged and critically severe spasm can induce intraluminal clotting and acute myocardial infarction. Recognizing the exceptionality and variability of ischemic presentations related to myocardial bridging is essential, as is establishing appropriate investigational methods for each of these facets of the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.