Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886398›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2025

Decoding High Post-TAVR Gradients: Insights From 4 Clinical Scenarios.

Federico Arturi, Francesco Cardaioli, Giuseppe Tarantini

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federico ArturiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy.
Francesco CardaioliDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe TarantiniDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiography is a well-established tool for evaluating bioprosthetic valve performance after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The presence of higher-than-expected echocardiographic gradients is not an uncommon finding and can be related to different clinical settings. This case series proposes a practical and multiparametric approach to interpreting high residual gradients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. We examine 4 common clinical scenarios: 1) pressure recovery; 2) high-flow state; 3) prosthesis-patient mismatch; and 4) suboptimal valve expansion. For each scenario, a comprehensive echocardiographic analysis, along with invasive hemodynamic evaluation, is reported.

Indexed as

echocardiographymean gradientsprosthesis–patient mismatchtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID39886398
PMCPMC11775786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.