Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886363›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025

Semi-quantitative scoring criteria based on multiple staining methods combined with machine learning to evaluate residual nuclei in decellularized matrix.

Meng Zhong, Hongwei He, Panxianzhi Ni, Can Huang, Tianxiao Zhang, Weiming Chen, Liming Liu, Changfeng Wang, Xin Jiang, Linyun Pu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Meng ZhongNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
Hongwei HeNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
Panxianzhi NiNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
Can HuangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
Tianxiao ZhangNeo Modulus (Suzhou) Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215163, China.
Weiming ChenNeo Modulus (Suzhou) Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215163, China.
Liming LiuKemoshen AI Lab, Shanghai Kemosheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201700, China.
Changfeng WangKemoshen AI Lab, Shanghai Kemosheng Medical Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 201700, China.
Xin JiangSichuan Testing Center for Biomaterials and Medical Devices Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610064, China.
Linyun PuSichuan Testing Center for Biomaterials and Medical Devices Co., Ltd, Chengdu 610064, China.
Tun YuanNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9713-6737
Jie LiangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
Yujiang FanNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.
Xingdong ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of residual nuclei in decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) biomaterials is critical for ensuring their quality and biocompatibility. However, current evaluation methods have limitations in addressing impurity interference and providing intelligent analysis. In this study, we utilized four staining techniques-hematoxylin-eosin staining, acetocarmine staining, the Feulgen reaction and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining-to detect residual nuclei in dECM biomaterials. Each staining method was quantitatively evaluated across multiple parameters, including area, perimeter and grayscale values, to establish a semi-quantitative scoring system for residual nuclei. These quantitative data were further employed as learning indicators in machine learning models designed to automatically identify residual nuclei. The experimental results demonstrated that no single staining method alone could accurately differentiate between nuclei and impurities. In this study, a semi-quantitative scoring table was developed. With this table, the accuracy of determining whether a single suspicious point is a cell nucleus has reached over 98%. By combining four staining methods, false positives caused by impurity contamination were eliminated. The automatic recognition model trained based on nuclear parameter features reached the optimal index of the model after several iterations of training in 172 epochs. The trained artificial intelligence model achieved a recognition accuracy of over 90% for detecting residual nuclei. The use of multidimensional parameters, integrated with machine learning, significantly improved the accuracy of identifying nuclear residues in dECM slices. This approach provides a more reliable and objective method for evaluating dECM biomaterials, while also increasing detection efficiency.

Indexed as

decellularized extracellular matrixmachine learningnuclear residuesemi-quantitative scoringstaining method

Identifiers

PMID39886363
PMCPMC11780845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.