Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886326›Full record

ArticleJournal of migration and health2025

Care and decision-making at the end of life for migrants living in the Netherlands: An intersectional analysis.

Marieke Torensma, Xanthe de Voogd, Roukayya Oueslati, Irene G M van Valkengoed, Dick L Willems, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Jeanine L Suurmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of migration and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marieke TorensmaAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute; Amsterdam UMC Expertise center for Palliative Care, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Xanthe de VoogdAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, De Boelelaan 1089a, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roukayya OueslatiDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Law, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Irene G M van ValkengoedAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dick L WillemsAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bregje D Onwuteaka-PhilipsenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeanine L SuurmondDepartment of Nursing, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As migrant populations age, the care system is confronted with the question how to respond to care needs of an increasingly diverse population of older adults. We used qualitative intersectional analysis to examine differential preferences and experiences with care at the end of life of twenty-five patients and their relatives from Suriname, Morocco and Turkey living in The Netherlands. Our analysis focused on the question how - in light of impairment - ethnicity, religion and gender intersect to create differences in social position that shape preferences and experiences related to three main themes: place of care at the end of life; discussing prognosis, advance care, and end-of-life care; and, end-of-life decision-making. Our findings show that belonging to an ethnic or religious minority brings forth concerns about responsive care. In the nursing home, patients' minority position and the interplay thereof with gender make it difficult for female patients to request and receive responsive care. Patients with a strong religious affiliation prefer to discuss diagnosis but not prognosis. These preferences are at interplay with factors related to socioeconomic status. The oversight of this variance hampers responsive care for patients and relatives. Preferences for discussion of medical aspects of care are subject to functional impairment and faith. Personal values and goals often remain unexpressed. Lastly, preferences regarding medical end-of-life decisions are foremost subject to religious affiliation and associated moral values. Respondents' impairment and limited Dutch language proficiency requires their children to be involved in decision-making. Intersecting gendered care roles determine that mostly daughters are involved. Considering the interplay of aspects of social identity and their effect on social positioning, and pro-active enquiry into values, goals and preferences for end-of-life care of patients and their relatives are paramount to achieve person centred and family-oriented care responsive to the needs of diverse communities.

Indexed as

End-of-life careEnd-of-life decision-makingIntersectionalityMigrantsPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID39886326
PMCPMC11780154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.