ReviewAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Gluteal Augmentation: A Historical Perspective on Aesthetic Practice.
Review in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buttock augmentation has emerged as a significant focus in cosmetic surgery, driven by advancements in techniques and increasing patient interest in body contouring. The evolution of this field, from early pioneering methods to modern, diverse approaches, highlights the need to understand the specific characteristics of each technique and their implications for aesthetic outcomes. The author aims to provide a detailed review of 4 major buttock augmentation techniques: gluteal implants, Brazilian butt lift (BBL), intramuscular polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and deep subcutaneous hyaluronic acid fillers. The goal is to assess the benefits and limitations of each method, helping practitioners and patients make informed decisions tailored to their preferences and needs. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, incorporating clinical studies, case reports, and expert opinions on these 4 techniques. Evaluation criteria included effectiveness, safety, recovery time, and patient satisfaction. Data were synthesized to provide a comparative analysis of each method. Gluteal implants offer predictable volume but involve surgical risks and lengthy recovery. The BBL, using autologous fat, delivers natural results and body contouring benefits but carries risks such as fat embolism and fat reabsorption. Intramuscular PMMA fillers provide permanent results with minimally invasive application but are challenging to remove. Hyaluronic acid fillers are reversible and minimally invasive but require periodic maintenance and may present risks like material migration. In this review, the author highlights the advantages and drawbacks of each technique, emphasizing individualized assessments and practitioner expertise. By outlining these methods, the author supports informed decision making in buttock augmentation. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.