ArticleMediterranean journal of rheumatology2024
Knowledge and Attitudes of Patients with Rheumatoid Diseases towards Biosimilars.
Article in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Biosimilars: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess patients' understanding and attitudes towards biosimilars in rheumatoid diseases in Greece. Methods: A convenience sample of patients with rheumatoid diseases who were members of the largest rheumatoid patient association (RHEUMAZIN) in Greece was selected for this survey. Data on patients' knowledge and attitudes towards biosimilars were collected with a web-based questionnaire. Results: Among the 309 patients, 60.2% were being treated with bio-originator products, 11% with biosimilars and another 28.8% did not know the type of their biologic therapy. Only 43.7% of the respondents reported they had adequate information about biologic treatments. About 47.9% knew what biosimilars are exactly and 81.2% stated that they need more information about them. The most influential patient information sources about biologics were rheumatologists (88.3%), the Internet (45%), and patient associations (40.5%). Only about 55-60% of the participants thought that biosimilars are comparable to their reference products in terms of safety, effectiveness, quality and regulatory requirements. Patients with adequate knowledge about biosimilars were significantly less concerned about switching from their reference products. A higher education level, previous biosimilar treatment experience, having rheumatologists, patient associations, regulatory bodies and the internet as main information sources, being better informed about the disease, biologic therapies and biosimilars, working and having adequate information about biosimilars were univariately associated with a significantly higher likelihood of having a positive attitude towards biosimilars. Conclusions: There is an urgent need for patient education about biosimilars in rheumatic diseases in Greece to enhance patient knowledge and ensure informed decisions on biosimilar use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.