ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Oral Versus Injectable Vitamin D Therapy for Treating Nutritional Rickets in Indian Children: A Comparative Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin D Supplementation and Its Interaction with Common Medications: Impact on Serum Levels and Quality of Life in Adults with Comorbidities.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Not All That Glitters Is Gold: Questioning High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation in Young Children.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rickets is a common metabolic bone disease in children, primarily caused by vitamin D deficiency. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of oral weekly vitamin D supplementation and injectable stoss therapy in treating nutritional rickets in Indian children. Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary care center. Forty children aged 6 months to 16 years with clinical, biochemical, and radiological evidence of nutritional rickets were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either oral vitamin D3 (60,000 IU weekly for 10 weeks) or a single intramuscular injection of vitamin D3 (600,000 IU). Clinical, biochemical, and radiological assessments were conducted at baseline and at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment. Results: Both treatment regimens significantly improved vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, with no significant differences between the groups. Radiological healing, assessed by Thacher's score, was achieved in both groups by 6 months. While both treatments were effective, injectable stoss therapy resulted in a more sustained increase in vitamin D levels and may offer better compliance due to its single-dose administration. No cases of local skin complications or vitamin D toxicity or symptomatic hypercalcemia were observed. Conclusion: Oral weekly and injectable stoss therapies are both effective and safe for treating nutritional rickets. Injectable stoss therapy may be more suitable for the Indian population due to its cost-effectiveness and lower compliance demands. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels emerged as a useful early marker of rickets severity as well as treatment response. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to prevent long-term skeletal deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.