Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886268›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Factors Related to the Diagnosis and Characteristics of Selective Screening for its Detection.

I Miras Aguilar, M Pangua Gómez, L Fidalgo Marrón, E Castaño Andreu, C Llorente Ruiz, G Galicia Poblet, A Aldea Romero, P Álvarez Estrada, A Ortigado Matamala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

I Miras AguilarGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8544-8987
M Pangua GómezGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
L Fidalgo MarrónGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
E Castaño AndreuGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
C Llorente RuizGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
G Galicia PobletGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
A Aldea RomeroGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
P Álvarez EstradaGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
A Ortigado MatamalaGetafe University Hospital: Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Breech presentation, family history, and physical examination are the most recognized risk factors for DDH, which form the basis of selective screening. However, this approach can lead to late diagnosis, invasive treatments, and complications. This study analyzes the effectiveness of selective screening and identifies additional factors related to DDH. Methods: A retrospective case-control analytical study is designed, including children who are assessed through screening between 2012 and 2019. The variables examined include clinical and gestational characteristics, as well as examination findings. Descriptive analysis is conducted, followed by univariate analysis using Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, or Student's Results: 762 children are included in the study, of which 33 are diagnosis with DDH. A total of 8,191 models are developed to predict DDH. The best logistic regression model identified the following independent predictors of dysplasia: newborn weight (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4), female sex (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.4-10.9), cephalic presentation (OR 17.8; 95% CI 2.3-137.3), primiparity (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.1-5.7), and examination (OR 149.6; 95% CI 18-1121.4). This model correctly classifies 83.6% patients (ROC curve 0.86). In selective screening, examination is the only identified risk factor for DDH, yet its sensitivity does not exceed 10%. Conclusions: This study proposed a total of 8191 models to predict DDH. The identified predictors include female sex, birth weight, cephalic presentation, and primiparity. While physical examination is the primary risk factor, it detects only decentred hips. The low sensitivity of selective screening raises questions about whether it remains the most appropriate method for identifying DDH in current practice.

Indexed as

DiagnosisDysplasiaHipsRisk factorsScreening

Identifiers

PMID39886268
PMCPMC11775354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.